Drawing Post #4: Emily Rooney's MFA Thesis Show

Last Thursday, March 17th, I had the pleasure of seeing Emily Rooney’s MFA photography thesis exhibition in Temple Gallery. Circumstances allowed for Emily to have use of all three spaces inside the gallery, and she used this opportunity to its fullest potential with a sparse but extremely specific exhibition incorporating a variety of media.

The gallery’s initial space was populated with groupings of objects, some abstract and some representational, and three black and white photographs with ample space around them on the walls. In the next gallery space, there were only two objects: a flag with a yin-yang symbol hung on the wall by one corner, and a rectangular wood frame with a marble tile top and an organically formed, brown plaster concave in the middle of the tile. The final space was reserved only for a video projection. In the video, viewers would hear a song with dramatically downshifted pitch while seeing a stop motion animation that features an Asian man’s face, a black woman and a white woman dancing and kissing, and a black figure skater. In addition to having its own room, the song from the video could be heard throughout the gallery during the entire exhibition experience before the video was viewed.

Instead of being isolated from each other, the arrangements of works in each room correspond to each other through particular themes and features. First, there is the recurring idea of images and objects in black and white. The few photographs are developed in black and white, and one also shows a black woman and a white woman beside each other. Objects arranged on the floor of the first room also share this theme, like a black pair of ceramic shoes on a white pillow. The viewer is greeted with the yin-yang flag in the next room, possibly one of the most iconic symbols illustrating black and white of all time, and the marble top on the wood structure contains a variety of greys. A piece of drawing paper laid on the marble with a few strokes of charcoal on it continues the theme, and makes viewers very curious as to whether it is part of the exhibition or a forgotten drawing homework assignment. While we enjoy the objects, we constantly hear the extremely low pitch and minimal structure of the song, reflecting the stark and minimal nature of black and whites images and objects. The women in the video further correspond to the ideas of black and white in terms of race.

Walking back out to the marble-topped structure from the last room, it is apparent that the deep pitch of the song corresponds to the shape of the concave amidst the marble tiles. The indistinguishable syllables formed by the pitch-shifted voice allude to the lumpy, brown organic texture in the concave, as does the simple structure of vocals and piano. Observing the concave from the entrance of the last room, it is also worth nothing that the shape of the concave projects down visibly below the marble surface inside the wooden frame. The resulting lump is wrapped in white cloth and has a mysterious, visceral weight to it. On the wall opposite the structure, the flag hanging from one corner also has this quality of weight and organic shape. Revisiting the first gallery room again on the way out, we see that the abstract wood framework forms in a row on the floor correspond to the basic structure of the song, of black and white, and of the marble-topped structure in the other room. We also realize that a photo of a large marble slab being taken from a quarry was giving a hint about what kind of materials and surfaces to expect later.

Emily mentions in her MFA thesis statement, which is on the Tyler exhibitions website, that she deals with the juxtaposition of minimalism and obvious content, and the subversion of conventionally gendered objects or images to talk about queer culture and gender issues through “queered formalism.” This process allows her to challenge the way symbols have become gendered, and to explore a wider variety of creative possibilities regarding the way minimalism, formalism, and heavy content work together. I think she has achieved these goals through the themes in her exhibition, particularly through juxtaposition of stark black and white contrasts, structural outlines, and organic forms. The huge variety of media she employs deepens the effectiveness of this juxtaposition by making viewers see and hear relationships between these elements.

Paul Gilbert is Hot/Cute

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7JBmK8dwpA&feature=related

Computer Post #3: Intellectual Property

Interestingly enough, conversations about intellectual property and free stuff on the internet came up in both my 2D and Computer classes right before spring break. I feel like this happens a lot in Foundations. The same thing comes up at the same time in different classes, and whether it’s totally orchestrated or not, I like it. In Computer class we looked at a case in which a girl’s church picnic photo on Flickr became the centerpiece of a Virgin Mobile campaign in Australia, and her family sued the company. With a situation like this one, I think there is a clear set of responsibilities on each side: internet resources, like Flickr, have a responsibility to let users know that their content will become public domain when posted online, unless there are privacy options offered, and users have a responsibility to pay attention and read the terms to which they are agreeing. If a program does let the user choose to keep content private, that privacy agreement must be honored. The internet is something that seems extremely difficult to regulate. In order to keep any semblance of safety or organization, there needs to be a mutual understanding between users and people in charge of resources that are used. As more kids are born into the world of readily accessible and ever-present internet, older generations need to make sure these kids are aware of how big and how public the internet really is. I think I’ve been extremely lucky to grow up with the internet, and I believe it is truly great thing when used safely and responsibly. I’m not sure how the lawsuit against Virgin Mobile over the Flickr photo went, but I feel like the family had little chance of winning because Flickr does warn users that content they upload becomes public. However, I also don’t think Virgin Mobile made a totally ethical decision in this case, and they could have very easily considered the girl’s age and asked permission to use the photo.
In Larry Lessig’s TED talk about laws that constrain creativity and user-generated content, he talks a lot about “remixes.” These remixes are created when users are inspired by other content and make those ideas their own through some kind of creative process. This could be Team Teamwork’s mashup of Mike Jones and music from Zelda, or a videogame based entirely on abstract expressionist art, or pretty much anything. Lessig argues that it is essential for people to have the ability to make remixes, and this means having free access to content on the internet. This brings me to some “unspoken rules” regarding public domain stuff, one of which is that content needs to be significantly altered enough in it remixed form in order for a user to legitimately get credit for that new form. Another is that if someone isn’t making money off of their remix, it’s totally fine for him to use the original content. I think these make sense, but they also raise a host of questions. For example, when is content significantly altered enough? I agree with Lessig that access to content is extremely important to cultural development, and I think these rules could potentially help inspire a system of public content that is regulated enough to respect intellectual property. Aside from these basic ideas for rules, one thing I think everyone should keep in mind regarding public content is ASKING FOR PERMISSION. The internet is super-fast and convenient, so simply asking, “Hey, do you mind if I use this?” takes less than a minute. It’s also common courtesy. Content on the internet is public, but identity is often clouded or totally anonymous, and I think this can bring out less considerate behavior.

Drawing Post #3: Nicolaes Maes: Back with a Vengeance

Visual analysis of artworks is interesting to me because the visual devices I write about are clearly present, but when anyone views a piece for the first time the brain processes these devices almost immediately. We don’t need to analyze works for visual devices in a composition to be effective, and they often work before we really “know” they are working. I would like to say that the inclusion of the cat in Maes’ Woman Plucking A Duck was what initially attracted me to the painting, but the absolute initial attraction was probably based on my eye catching a contrasting color or the scene’s light source. My brain would never have registered the cat if some other compositional element hadn’t caught my attention first. I’d say I was initially attracted to this piece by the atmospheric Vermeer-type lighting and the reds and oranges that stand out. Other than red and orange, the colors of this piece are predominantly black, brown, and grey. The atmosphere created by the light source and Maes’ handling of the light reminds me of late afternoon, when the sun isn’t really setting but is low. This time of day tends to be a very contemplative time for me, and can often be extremely depressing or unsettling. On a personal level, this painting draws me to moments where I have been simultaneously content with life and sorrowful because I know it has to end.
If the museum’s smell affected my perception of this piece, the effects were largely subconscious. But I did notice that much of the museum smells vaguely sweet and lived-in without being dirty or old. The room’s comfortable temperature made feel closer to the work rather than alienated from it, so temperature probably affected my perception even more than smells.
I think the paintings are grouped by region or time period, but I did find it surprising that this piece is on a wall filled mostly with landscapes. Of nine paintings, three are genres among the landscapes. These are all sized similarly enough that their close arrangement doesn’t really detract from the viewing experience. Maes’ painting is on the far left of the top row, and is placed slightly above my eye level so it was a little awkward to view. Although it is out on the fringe and up in the corner, the limited palette in comparison with the surrounding landscape paintings does make this one stand out considerably.
During my second visit to this piece, I was lucky to be around when a tour guide stopped to talk about it with her group. According to her, this seemingly innocent genre painting is actually full of 17th-century Dutch innuendo: the open vessels and open windows suggest sexuality as well as the mischievous cat. In combination with the cat, the painting apparently also sends a moralizing message about sexuality causing domestic turmoil. Once she pointed this out, I felt really thick for not considering the symbolism. Innuendo in art is obviously nothing new, but this makes me think of Bosch’s “vessel on a stick” in Ship of Fools.